Posted by BigSpiderBeck on March 17, 2000 at 18:22:14:
In Reply to: oh my! posted by The Fabone on March 17, 2000 at 14:30:22:
: re: setonhall-oregon...i tought i heard both teams had timeouts... why didn't seton hall use it (it worked for them) and why didn't oregon use it after seton hall scored (it didn't work for them).
I didn't watch the game, but if I had the last possession with 10 seconds left, I'd run down the court and make the winning shot with 1.9 seconds left.
As for Oregon not using a timeout...something about temporarily losing your mind in the heat of the moment.
: re: florida-butler...great game, butler should have won it many times over. but you gotta HIT your free throws in crunchtime (butler actually had a good free throw shooting team). and had that butler defender move
: four inches to his right, he would have gotten the charge and butler would be playing illinois
Lots of "IFS": IF UCLA was leading at the half yesterday, would that have prevented my uneasy stomach? things jus' happen. for a reason